/ case studies / ai treasury Work with us

Case Study · AI-Managed Treasury · Non-Profit

A $10M reserve, managed with an agent stack.

A national non-profit (501(c)(3)) held its reserves in long-term investments and low-yield money market. Over a nine-month engagement we designed a long-horizon 80/10/10 reserve mandate, built a three-layer AI agent stack to run it — agents reviewing agents, humans in the loop every day — and handed the whole system to their internal team. The fund is live, running at a $10M start.

Sector: National non-profit (501(c)(3)) Mandate: $10M reserve Engagement: 9 months (Oct 2025 – Jul 2026) Outcome: Live · fully handed off
$10M
Reserve deployed under the new mandate — live today
80 / 10 / 10
Long-horizon Bitcoin · USDC at 6% yield · active giving to live projects
3 layers
Agent stack: monitoring → rebalancing & risk → reporting, with an orchestrator above
9 months
Proposal to full handoff — run today by the client’s own team

The organization

Reserves working at money-market speed.

A national non-profit with real reserves and a real mission — and a treasury doing what most non-profit treasuries do: sitting in a mix of long-term investments and low-yield money market, safe but stagnant, while the mission it exists to fund moved faster than the money behind it.

The board didn’t want a trading desk. They wanted a durable, transparent, long-horizon reserve strategy — one that a board could govern, an auditor could follow, and a small team could actually operate. That last part is where AI came in.

The mandate · as of July 1, 2026

The reserve, at a glance.

~$45K
Yield earned to date — USDC sleeve, stated 6% APY
~$5K/mo
Yield run-rate on the $1M stablecoin sleeve
$1M
Standing giving sleeve — deployed to live projects
Years
How the BTC sleeve is measured — not months. No monthly marks published, by mandate.

Earnings to date — the yield sleeve

$45K $22K $0 ~$45K Oct ’25 Feb ’26 Jul 1 ’26

Cumulative yield on the $1M USDC sleeve at its stated 6% APY: ~$5K/month, ~$45K by July 1. This is arithmetic on the mandate’s stated terms — not a reproduction of the client’s statements. The BTC sleeve carries no chart here on purpose: a long-horizon, no-active-trading mandate doesn’t narrate itself month to month.

Allocation

80% Bitcoin — long-horizon, no active trading
10% USDC stablecoin at 6% yield
10% Active giving — deployed to live projects

The agent stack

Orchestratorcoordinates the layers — and agents review other agents’ work
Layer 1 · Monitoringpositions, prices, thresholds, anomalies
Layer 2 · Rebalancing & riskdrift checks, limits, proposed — never autonomous — actions
Layer 3 · Reportingboard- and controller-grade reporting, on cadence
Human in the loop — dailyevery material move reviewed by people, every day

What we did

Nine months, six moves.

1

Designed the mandate

An 80/10/10 structure built for a board, not a trader: 80% Bitcoin held long-horizon with no active trading — volatility absorbed by time horizon, not by trading — 10% USDC earning a stated 6%, and 10% deployed as active giving. Generosity isn’t what’s left over; it’s an allocation.

2

Paid the tuition ourselves

Before this engagement, we ran our own automated trading experiments in public — with our own money — and published the autopsy when a strategy failed. Every lesson that survived — position discipline, kill-switches, monitoring that never sleeps, knowing when a market is telling you no — was incorporated into this stack. The client got the lessons without paying for them.

3

Built the three-layer agent stack

Monitoring, rebalancing & risk, reporting — each its own layer, each with its own agents, an orchestrator coordinating above them. We forked the RAG and personality of our own in-house analyst agent as the foundation, then tuned it to a treasury’s temperament: patient, skeptical, allergic to excitement.

✓ Live in production
4

Made the agents watch each other

Agents review other agents’ work before it reaches a human. A monitoring alert gets checked by a second agent before escalation; a rebalancing proposal gets an independent risk read. Disagreement escalates to people. No single model’s output moves money.

5

Kept humans in the loop — daily

The same governance rule we ship everywhere: agents notify and propose; they do not act. The client’s team reviews the stack’s output every day. A long-horizon, no-active-trading mandate makes this easy — the system’s job is vigilance, not velocity.

6

Handed it off

The stack is run today by the client’s own operation: two fund managers, a controller, board oversight, and two AI engineers. Our engagement is closed. That’s the point — we build systems clients own, not dependencies they rent.

✓ Engagement closed

Where it stands

Live, governed, and theirs.

$10M live
The fund is running. Reserve deployed under the 80/10/10 mandate, operated by the agent stack with daily human review — today, not someday.
Handed off
Self-sufficient in 9 months. The client’s fund managers, controller, board, and AI engineers run the system we built. We closed the engagement — the second time we’ve exited a client this way on purpose.
~$45K
What the USDC sleeve’s stated 6% yield accrues over nine months — arithmetic, not a client statement.
Daily
Human-in-the-loop cadence. Agents propose; people decide; nothing moves alone.
10%
Of the reserve deployed as active giving — the mission funded as a standing allocation, not an afterthought.
Withheld
Performance actuals — by design. A non-profit’s statements aren’t ours to publish. The structure, the stack, and the handoff are the case study.

Why it worked

We lost our own money learning these lessons — so the client didn’t have to.

Horizon beats activity

A long-horizon, no-active-trading mandate is one a board can govern and a small team can run. Vigilance, not velocity.

Agents review agents

No single model’s output moves money. Independent agent review first, human review always, disagreement escalates.

Tuition already paid

The risk playbook came from our own public trading experiments — including the one that failed. Scars transfer; losses don’t have to.

Build owners, not dependents

Nine months, then handoff to the client’s own team. The engagement ends; the system stays. That’s the model.

Reserves working at money-market speed?

We design governed, long-horizon treasury systems that a board can trust and your own team can run — and we hand you the keys.

Start a conversation → More case studies