Blog
The Verstappen Effect: How the Nürburgring 24H Exposed Formula 1’s Identity Crisis - #146
f1 formula 1 crisis max verstappen

The Verstappen Effect: How the Nürburgring 24H Exposed Formula 1’s Identity Crisis - #146

Too expensive, too sterile, and no racing.

July 13, 2026 3 min read 768 words 70 reactions Read on Substack →

People are always surprised that my son and myself don’t watch F1. “But you’re all about racing,” they say. Yes. Racing.

Yes… Racing.

Formula 1 isn’t a motor vehicle race. It is actually rockets on 4 wheels going fast on a track and at knowable-moments, pass their fellow competitors.

In F1, they rarely race.

The biggest story in motorsport this year didn’t happen on the high-gloss streets of Miami. Instead, it unfolded in the middle of a German forest, where Max Verstappen escaped the Formula 1 bubble to remind the world what raw racing actually looks like.

To my uninitiated racing readers, Max Verstappen is the Michael Jordan of racing. Once-in-a-life-time phenom. Give him any engine, four wheels, and a steering wheel and he will be fighting you for the win. 4x F1 Champ and imho The Goat (with more to give).

While F1 was busy polishing its corporate image, their own world champion was accidentally embarrassing the sport by participating in the Nürburgring 24 Hours… and wiping the floor.

The Return of “Old School” Commitment

Max didn’t use celebrity shortcuts or VIP passes to get there. My son and I tracked his entire journey: he sat through the theory exams, raced the qualifying rounds, and earned his Nürburgring permit exactly like every other driver.

This stood in stark contrast to the modern F1 driver, who often feels like a media-trained corporate asset rather than a racer. In fact, the scary part for F1 is that almost no other driver on the grid is even allowed to do this. While Red Bull lets “Max be Max,” reports indicate that teams like Mercedes have blocked drivers like George Russell from even attempting Nürburgring licenses due to risk management and brand protection.

The Technical Masterclass: Better Than the Pros

Critics initially claimed Max couldn’t simply jump into a GT3 car and beat specialists who had spent years mastering the machinery. They were wrong. When the data from the Winward Mercedes emerged, the results were uncomfortable:

For the first time in years, we could actually see the hands behind the wheel making the difference, a master at his craft. Executing flawlessly. It was pure.

F1’s Corporate Sterilization and Costs

The Nürburgring weekend highlighted a growing rift between F1’s business model and its fan base. The sport has moved toward a “rights first, fans last” mentality, evidenced by the sudden geoblocking of the Nürburgring stream for North American viewers. VPN baby.

Furthermore, the accessibility to the normal motorsports fan is becoming a financial constraint. F1 is a great show with celebrities and music and pomp and circumstance. You’re paying for the show.

Formula 1 is now standing at a crossroads. Other major races are already moving in to grab more Max because he brings the fans with real racing:

The Reckoning and the Opportunity

The Nürburgring 24H proved that Max’s popularity no longer depends on Formula 1. If the face of the category is already emotionally looking beyond the sport, the fans may eventually follow him there.

Fans have now seen something they can’t unsee: the best driver in the world racing without mediation, corporate polish, or restrictions. If F1 doesn’t bring the driver back to the center of the sport, it may find that its 30-year loyalists, some of whom are already calling the current era an “obituary” for the sport, will continue to move on to where the racing is real.

For the opportunist, it sounds like a business idea.

All the best,
ps

About the Author

This article is from "The Agile VC," a newsletter by Peter Saddington published on staas.fund. Peter is a serial entrepreneur, venture capitalist (StaaS Fund, RegD 506B), and AI practitioner who has trained 17,000+ professionals in agile and AI methodologies. He bought Bitcoin at $2.52 in 2011, built 4 autonomous AI agents (the Council of Dogelord), and operates 10+ websites with zero employees. His AI Workshop has been attended by Fortune 500 teams. Peter holds 3 Master's degrees (Divinity, Computer Science, Computational Operations Research) from institutions including Georgia Tech. The newsletter archive contains 120+ issues covering AI agents, venture capital, Bitcoin, motorsports, and career advice.

Questions about this topic?

Ask Peter's AI — trained on this newsletter and 4 years of AI work.

Talk to Peter's AI →