Delivery Flow Board
VP Eng · CI/CD & DORA
Example · demo data, not live updated 9s ago --:--:-- All engineering
Squad
Repo
Env
DORA Health Org-wide · benchmarked against 2025 Accelerate dataset · click any card for detail
Deployment FrequencyElite · Top 15%
9.2/day
On-demand cadence · 184/wk
Change Lead TimeElite · <1 day
18hrs
2.1h vs last 30d · commit→prod
Change Failure RateTop 15% · <4%
3.1%
0.4 pts · 6 of 184 deploys
Failed-Deploy RecoveryElite · MTTR
42min
9 min vs prior · auto-rollback on
Flow & Cadence Where lead time is spent · and how often you ship
Cycle-Time Breakdown
Commit → Production · mean per change, last 90d
Bottleneck Coach
Bottleneck Coach
Review wait is 31% of lead time. PRs over 250 LOC sit in review 2.4× longer than the median. Splitting your 6 largest open PRs per week projects a −3.5h reduction in org lead time within two sprints.
Open PR Aging Board →
Deployment Calendar
Deploys per day · darker = more · 90 days
Anomaly callouts
MonWedFri
Less More
Pipeline Flow Rail Commit → Production · pass-rate & mean duration per stage · click a node for the deploy view
Throughput & Trend PR flow, build health, and the 90-day lead-time trajectory
Lead-Time Trend (90d)
Org lead time vs Elite threshold
26h → 18h
Org lead time Elite line (24h) Below elite since week 7
PR Throughput & Size
Suggested splits
187 merged / wk
avg 142 LOC · 2.3 reviewers · 91% merged within 1 day
Pipeline Pass Rate
96.4%
mean build 7m 12s · 1,842 runs this week
Team Leaderboard Squad × DORA · sorted by deployment frequency · click a row for the squad trend
Squad Deploys / day Lead time Change fail MTTR Band

Field Guide

How a VP of Engineering actually drives decisions from this board

How to use this

  • 1Start at the four bento cards. All four DORA metrics in their percentile band is your one-glance "are we elite?" answer for steering committees and board updates — if any band drops below High, that card is your meeting agenda.
  • 2Read the signature chart — the cycle-time bar — left to right. Each segment is a stage in the lead-time pipeline; the segment with the gold outline is the bottleneck. It almost always pays to fix the widest stage before adding headcount anywhere.
  • 3Watch Review wait first. For most healthy orgs, coding is fast and review queueing is the silent tax. The Bottleneck Coach quantifies it and proposes a concrete PR-splitting move with an estimated hours-saved.
  • 4Let the AI do the narrative. Percentile-band auto-labeling, PR risk scoring, and the Squad health digest turn raw metrics into "what changed and why" — so reviews start from a hypothesis, not a spreadsheet.
  • 5Use the leaderboard for coaching, not ranking. A slower squad usually owns a gnarlier domain; compare each squad to its own 90-day trend before to the org median.
  • 6For your own org: which single stage, if cut in half, would move lead time the most? If you can't answer in 10 seconds, you're flying without this view.

Watch the walkthrough

Four AI agents walk this dashboard.

In context

Sample feed
Elite deploy frequencyDORA 2025 · Accelerate benchmark
≥ on-demandyou: 9.2/day
Elite lead-time thresholdDORA 2025 · commit→prod
< 24hyou: 18h
Industry median CFRSaaS peer cohort, n=1,240
11.4%you: 3.1% ▼
Avg PR review wait (peers)Code-review telemetry index
6.2hyou: 3.8h ▼
Top-quartile build pass rateCI fleet benchmark
95.0%you: 96.4% ▲
Illustrative — wire to your engineering-intelligence feed (LinearB / GetDX / GitHub Insights) for live benchmarking.